On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:39:09AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > However, by putting the burden onto drivers, drivers can choose a > conservative power saving level when no application has registered its > pm_qos requirements, and once applications start using the it deeper > power levels can be chosen as appropriate. This still requires some > userspace to turn on power saving to start with, which I think would be > appropriately placed in NM (or connman, of course). I think you've made a good case for pushing the power savings decisions onto the drivers. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
