Can you try the attached patch for rate scaling? Thanks, Abhijeet On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 14:21 -0700, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 10:50 -0700, reinette chatre wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 19:29 -0700, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 03:29 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 11:17 -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote: > > > > > From: Abhijeet Kolekar <abhijeet.kolekar@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > Patch fixes the bug 1900 at > > > > > http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1900 > > > > > > > > > > Issues: > > > > > Throughput and success ratio calculations were not done properly. > > > > > Number of retries were exceeding 16. > > > > > > > > ether. > > > > > > > > On the other omitting the 'disable_hw_scan=1' option (which appears to > > > > work once again, since few days ago it broke s2disk with hung scan) - > > > > > > Ah , I remember now. The disable_hw_scan=0 breaks (!) > > > the rfkill support. > > > > Could you please provide more details about this issue? We are > > interested in steps to reproduce and logs you may have. > > A way to reproduce (without NM): > > * Start scanning in a loop > while true ; do sudo iwlist scan ; done > > * press rfkill - scan hangs forever. > * press rfkill again - doesn't help > > I have acer 5720G with hardware rfkill. > > > The problem seems to be that if user presses rfkill during scan, it > hangs. > > > How about rate control issues I still see, do you know why upload is > slower that download? > > Best regards, > Maxim Levitsky > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Attachment:
0001-iwl3945-control-rate-decrease.patch
Description: application/mbox
