On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 06:39:12PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Might be worth adding a note why this is the case. Can't we simply avoid > this by checking earlier for the error or simply assigning it an actual > default _good_ hw rate value? I guess an alternative is to initialize to 0, that would count any rx packets whose hw rate we don't know about as the base rate, so it would probably bias the RC to 1mb, but this is already one of those 'should never happen' cases. Also I can't forsee having a rate index > 127 so changing the sign is pretty low risk. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
