On 26.2.2009 02:06, Bob Copeland wrote:
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c
@@ -1140,12 +1140,14 @@ ath5k_rxbuf_setup(struct ath5k_softc *sc, struct ath5k_buf *bf)
struct ath5k_hw *ah = sc->ah;
struct sk_buff *skb = bf->skb;
struct ath5k_desc *ds;
+ dma_addr_t dma_addr;
if (!skb) {
- skb = ath5k_rx_skb_alloc(sc,&bf->skbaddr);
+ skb = ath5k_rx_skb_alloc(sc,&dma_addr);
if (!skb)
return -ENOMEM;
bf->skb = skb;
+ bf->skbaddr = dma_addr;
Hmm, rather than the caller, ath5k_rx_skb_alloc is wrong here in my
eyes. It shouldn't touch the second parameter unless it knows it won't
fail anymore.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
