Hi Johannes, > > I have been running the wireless-testing kernel from yesterday and I > > realized that something with the link quality values from scanning > > results is broken. > > What exactly is broken by this? Wext never guaranteed that 'qual' values > be present, and thus any application that breaks from not having 'qual' > is broken anyway. that be it, but I would still consider this a regression. Since when do we just start removing API details without any proper warning or grace period? Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
