Francesco and Lorenzo, Should the sequence numbers be sequential? Do you know of any case where the cookie would be incremented but the sequence number be unchanged? The reason I'm asking is that I modified my system to dump the registers and memory whenever a new_seq != (old_seq + 1 ) & 0xFFF. When I do that, I see b43_dma_handle_txstatus called cookie 0x2062 and seq 0x371. From my buffered status info, the previous call had cookie 0x2060 and seq 0x371. BTW, the proprietary firmware does the same thing, but it never gets called with the poisoned skb. Larry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
