On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 01:37:49PM -0500, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:12:34 +0000 (GMT), Hugh Dickins wrote > > Hi Bob, > > > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Bob Copeland wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:35:29 +0000 (GMT), Hugh Dickins wrote > > > > But I haven't seen any allocation failure for several days. > > > > I didn't get any while trying to simplify the reproduction, > > > > > > I'll go ahead and push this upstream then today or tomorrow; let me > > > know if you run into any problems with more testing. > > > > Just a prod: I've not seen your fix go into the 2.6.29-rc tree yet. > > Good point, it is queued for 2.6.30. John, would there be any problem > with including a8e3cd514, "ath5k: fix bf->skb==NULL panic in > ath5k_tasklet_rx" for 2.6.29? Hmmm...well it is a little big, but I guess it is OK. Do you have an example of the stack trace? Or a link to a bugzilla or somesuch would be even better... John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
