On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 03:50:55PM +0000, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:18 PM, John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> You probably don't hang out in the right place... two people on the > >> sourceforge zd1211 mailing list recently reported that > >> MAXIM_NEW_RF=0x08 is just the same as UW2453_RF=0x09 ; and one of > > > Or someone can send a patch with a report that it is working for them > > and I'll just merge it... :-) > > The patch and success report was posted to the sourceforge zd1211 > mailing list 2 weeks ago - it is actually in the mailing list archive > ( http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=zd1211-devs > , 2nd item from top) I think Daniel Drake and a few of the zd1211rw > people are on that list . For slightly controversial(?) change like > this - comparing to just adding vendor+product ids - it is probably > more appropriate if/when one of them decide to put it in... This doesn't seem any more contorversial than a USB ID to me...? > It is likely that 0x08 is just an older 0x09, so it is probably more > appropriate to put the 0x08 RF id before, rather than after the 0x09 > case as in the posted patch to the zd1211 mailing list. ACK on the style note. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
