On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 15:49 +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 03:40:53PM +0530, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 10:09 +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > > > There is no point having the bss information of currently associated AP > > > when the AP is detected to be out of range. > > > > Seems sane to me. There are a few other places I think where we hold on > > to the bss info way too long, in fact, we hold on to it _forever_ most > > of the time. > > > > Yeah, we hold bss info when we get direct probe timeout, auth timeout and assoc > timeout. I will remove bss in those places also n the next version. Not just that, but also when we've found a BSS and never connect to it, we'll never time it out. It's nothing you need to fix though, I'm perfectly ok with just putting this patch in as a start. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
