On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:22:14PM +0100, Stefanik Gábor wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:14 PM, John W. Linville > <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:38:08PM -0500, Glenn Burkhardt wrote: > >> On Friday 16 January 2009 10:33:13 Bob Copeland wrote: > >> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Glenn Burkhardt > >> > > >> > <gbburkhardt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > ath5k_pci 0000:00:07.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 > >> > > ath5k_pci 0000:00:07.0: registered as 'phy0' > >> > > phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'pid' > >> > > >> > Can you change the rate control algorithm to minstrel and retry? > >> > >> I built a 2.6.28.1-9 kernel to get the minstrel code for ath5k. The > >> kernel for Suse 11.1 is 2.6.27.7-9. But that means that more could have > >> changed besides the rate control code. > >> > >> It looks like minstrel and pid give about the same result, a bit worse that > >> the ath_pci driver right now. Performance seems to vary from day to day. > >> I'll experiment some more, and switch transmission channels. I'm not getting > >> the really poor performance with ath5k right now. > >> > >> I haven't looked yet - is there a way to switch to 'pid' rate control without > >> rebuilding the kernel? > > > > If you configure your kernel to include multiple rate control > > algorithms then you can use the 'ieee80211_default_rc_algo' module > > option for mac80211. Of course, changing that only works if you > > rmmod/insmod mac80211. > > > > John > > Judging from this, is it really a good idea to hide pid behind EMBEDDED? I've been wondering about that myself. I'm inclined to think no. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
