On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 05:14:54PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 10:34 +0100, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > On Sunday 28 December 2008, Piter PUNK wrote: > > > > If the those 148f:2573 USB devices doesn't exists or > > > if they exists and works fine with rt73usb, can we > > > remove 148f:2573 from rt2500usb? > > > > No we can't, you can blame manufacturers for shipping > > USB sticks with different chipsets but the exact same USB ID. > > Maybe there are some hints on the USB level that would make it possible > to distinguish between the devices without loading the driver? > Something like the number of endpoints? Then we could ask USB > developers to provide a way to specify them in the USB devece table. Seems like a trouble to solve a non-problem... > > On Sunday 28 December 2008, Piter PUNK wrote: > > > Loading rt2500usb AND rt73usb don't have any functional > > > problem. All wireless devices works fine. But is very > > > annoying the additional modules loaded. I'm not sure I see how it is annoying, but I'm sorry it annoys you. Nevertheless, I don't think it is worth much effort to fix it. John -- John W. Linville Linux should be at the core linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx of your literate lifestyle. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
