[+cc Bartosz since this is related to pwrctrl]
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 05:10:08PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
> If the link is not up till the pwrctl drivers enable power to endpoints
> then cur_bus_speed will not be updated with correct speed.
>
> As part of rescan, pci_bus_add_devices() will be called and as part of
> it update the link bus speed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pci/bus.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> index 98910bc0fcc4..994879071d4c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> @@ -432,6 +432,9 @@ void pci_bus_add_devices(const struct pci_bus *bus)
> struct pci_dev *dev;
> struct pci_bus *child;
>
> + if (bus->self)
> + pcie_update_link_speed((struct pci_bus *)bus);
Why the cast? I guess to discard "const"? I would prefer to avoid
that if we can.
The only existing callers of pcie_update_link_speed() are from bwctrl,
where it obviously makes sense because bwctrl manages link speed, and
from pci_set_bus_speed() in the pci_alloc_child_bus() path.
If we call pcie_update_link_speed() here, do we still need the
pci_set_bus_speed() in pci_alloc_child_bus()?
Bartosz, so you have any suggestions? Is there a point in pwrctrl
where it would make sense to do this, similar to what bwctrl does?
> list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
> /* Skip already-added devices */
> if (pci_dev_is_added(dev))
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
