Andi Kleen wrote: >> According to the rate control's view, only the 1M has a usable >> success probability. It's rather insteresting that 11M is the only >> other rate that had some successes. With this kind of results, the >> only two options that I can think of are either a systematic tx >> status reporting error (false negative for the IEEE80211_TX_STAT_ACK >> flag), or something PHY related. > > Ok. Any more data I should provide to help tracking this down? > Do you want the same from the RaLink? Yes, It'd be interesting to see if the table looks similar or if more rates work. - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
