We used ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces instead of ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces_mtx, which is the one to use when the wiphy lock is held. Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Daniel Gabay <daniel.gabay@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mld/low_latency.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mld/low_latency.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mld/low_latency.c index 439fc10a4a41..e74e66735f52 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mld/low_latency.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mld/low_latency.c @@ -120,9 +120,9 @@ static void iwl_mld_low_latency_wk(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct wiphy_work *wk) wiphy_delayed_work_queue(mld->wiphy, &mld->low_latency.work, MLD_LL_ACTIVE_WK_PERIOD); - ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces(mld->hw, - IEEE80211_IFACE_ITER_NORMAL, - iwl_mld_low_latency_iter, mld); + ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces_mtx(mld->hw, + IEEE80211_IFACE_ITER_NORMAL, + iwl_mld_low_latency_iter, mld); } int iwl_mld_low_latency_init(struct iwl_mld *mld) -- 2.34.1
