On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 15:13 +0530, Sujith wrote: [...] Looks good to me, just one thought I had: > + /* Disregard subsequent beacons if we are already running a timer > + processing a CSA */ > + > + if (ifsta->flags & IEEE80211_STA_CSA_RECEIVED) > + return; Should we verify that we're getting subsequent CSAs? Is it possible that an AP drops the CSA element again and expects STAs to _not_ switch in that case? Or, even if that is not possible, should we verify that anyway? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
