CC-ing Dennis, the original submitter, and also Ping-Ke, who has done a lot of 6 GHz updates, for more information. On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 4:03 PM <rmandrad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Allow 6ghz in the US > > https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/05/26/2020-11236/unlicensed-u > se-of-the-6-ghz-band allows the use of 6ghz in the US namely section > 59 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2020-11236/p-66 with absolute radiated > power of 30 dBm for the 320 megahertz channel Please don't wrap URLs. Please see the original submission [1], which explains why the power limit is so low. Basically, neither the database nor the kernel supports specifying power spectral density limits, so we can only take the narrowest bandwidth to calculate the applicable power limit. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/wireless-regdb/CAPRryQp6j4UKvLZCkMAuQdaxepMBETQUJ1eNULJSh3ZWXC0f5Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > based on this remove NO-IR flag and allow 30 dBm max power The original submission mentioned NO-IR requirements, though I did not find such wording. Dennis, do you have any ideas? > Signed-off-by: Rudy Andram <rmandrad@xxxxxxxxx> > > diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt > index 803f1bc..bc2b4fe 100644 > --- a/db.txt > +++ b/db.txt > @@ -1953,7 +1953,8 @@ country US: DFS-FCC > (5850 - 5895 @ 40), (27), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW, NO-IR > # 6g band > # > https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/05/26/2020-11236/unlicensed-u > se-of-the-6ghz-band > - (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR, NO-IR > + (5925 - 6425 @ 320), (30), NO-OUTDOOR > + (6525 - 6875 @ 320), (30), NO-OUTDOOR The database entry targets LPI usage instead of standard usage, which requires the presence of AFC, which is also a requirement that the database is unable to represent. And under LPI usage, the full 6GHz band (U-NII-5, 6, 7) is available. Thanks ChenYu > # 60g band > # reference: section IV-D > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-16-89A1.pdf > # channels 1-6 EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak) > > >