On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 12:22:49AM +0530, Stefanik Gábor wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan >> <vasanth@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/ath9k.h | 5 +++++ >> > drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/hw.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/main.c | 9 +++++++-- >> > drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/reg.h | 10 ++++++++++ >> > 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > >> > <snip> >> >> Probably a NOBTCOEX modparam might be a good idea - when implementing >> BT coexistence in b43, a lot of non-BT-aware cards failed to work >> because the BT GPIO line was connected to the TX preamplifier, >> breaking all TX. > > No need for any module parameters for enabling BT coex. It is > already running without any issue on Windows Vista. > > Vasanth >> >> -- >> Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-) > Broadcom's BT coex was also running correctly on Windows Vista, but it still caused problems on Linux. -- Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
