Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Make it print the TX power details for RF paths C and D, and for 3SS and
> 4SS rates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c
> index 1adb03d1210a..0efb5c19b90e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c
> @@ -708,20 +708,14 @@ static int rtw_debugfs_get_tx_pwr_tbl(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> "path", "rate", "pwr", "base", "byr", "lmt", "sar", "rem");
>
> mutex_lock(&hal->tx_power_mutex);
> - for (path = RF_PATH_A; path <= RF_PATH_B; path++) {
> + for (path = RF_PATH_A; path <= RF_PATH_D; path++) {
Can we limit path and rate by efuse->hw_cap.nss or rf_path?
Only showing two paths and 2SS rate for 2SS chips would avoid confusing.
> /* there is no CCK rates used in 5G */
> if (hal->current_band_type == RTW_BAND_5G)
> rate = DESC_RATE6M;
> else
> rate = DESC_RATE1M;
>
> - /* now, not support vht 3ss and vht 4ss*/
> - for (; rate <= DESC_RATEVHT2SS_MCS9; rate++) {
> - /* now, not support ht 3ss and ht 4ss*/
> - if (rate > DESC_RATEMCS15 &&
> - rate < DESC_RATEVHT1SS_MCS0)
> - continue;
> -
> + for (; rate <= DESC_RATEVHT4SS_MCS9; rate++) {
> rtw_get_tx_power_params(rtwdev, path, rate, bw,
> ch, regd, &pwr_param);
>
> --
> 2.48.1
