On Friday 02 January 2009 20:06:08 Kalle Valo wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Stefanik Gábor <netrolller.3d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Probably a NOBTCOEX modparam might be a good idea - when implementing > > BT coexistence in b43, a lot of non-BT-aware cards failed to work > > because the BT GPIO line was connected to the TX preamplifier, > > breaking all TX. > > It would be nice to have a common interface for this, for example > through nl80211. Lots of drivers have BT coexistence support. But this > is just an idea. Well, why? If btcoex works correctly (= is not buggy), the user does not notice it at all. I see no reason to turn it off. Except if it's buggy. But then we should simply fix it or always disable it at compiletime, if it's not possible to fix. -- Greetings, Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
