On Friday 02 January 2009 19:52:49 Stefanik Gábor wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan > <vasanth@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/ath9k.h | 5 +++++ > > drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/hw.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/main.c | 9 +++++++-- > > drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/reg.h | 10 ++++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > <snip> > > Probably a NOBTCOEX modparam might be a good idea - when implementing > BT coexistence in b43, a lot of non-BT-aware cards failed to work And what makes you think that atheros also ships cards with broken btcoex support? -- Greetings, Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
