Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 1/30/2025 1:18 AM, Aditya Kumar Singh wrote:
>
>> On 1/30/25 14:19, Remi Pommarel wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:21:54PM +0530, Aditya Kumar Singh wrote:
>>>> On 1/29/25 22:25, Remi Pommarel wrote:
>>>>> Currently in ath12k_mac_op_sta_statistics() there is the following
>>>>> logic:
>>>>>
>>>>> if (!arsta->txrate.legacy && !arsta->txrate.nss)
>>>>> return;
>>>>>
>>>>> Because ath12k_sta_statistics is used to report many info to iw wlan0 link,
>>>>> if it return for empty legacy and nss of arsta->txrate, then the other
>>>>> stats after it will not be set.
>>>>>
>>>>> To address this issue remove the return and instead invert the logic to set
>>>>> the txrate logic if (arsta->txrate.legacy || arsta->txrate.nss).
>>>>>
>>>>> The same was done also in both ath10k with commit 1cd6ba8ae33e ("ath10k:
>>>>> remove return for NL80211_STA_INFO_TX_BITRATE") and ath11k as well with
>>>>> commit 1d795645e1ee ("ath11k: remove return for empty tx bitrate in
>>>>> mac_op_sta_statistics").
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.3.1-00173-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>>>>
>>>> MISSING_BLANK_LINE
>>>> 'Tested-on:' tag missing blank line after it.
>>>>
>>>> You missed v1 comment? :)
>>>
>>> Yes sorry I think your mail never reached me, did you CC me ? Do you
>>> need a respin ?
>>>
>>
>> No problem. No need of respin just because of this. I think Jeff can fix
>> in pending?
>>
>> It's strange that the v1 reply appears to be delivered from my mail box
>> and it is sent to the list. I see even Jeff replying to that. But none
>> of those are captured in patchwork. Not sure.
>
> it was only sent to the ath12k list
> perhaps you need to include linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yeah, patchwork only follows linux-wireless.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
