On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 07:59 -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > > While at it, can we define these a bit better? > No. We're not going to do "while at it do random other changes", ever. johannes
On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 07:59 -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > > While at it, can we define these a bit better? > No. We're not going to do "while at it do random other changes", ever. johannes
![]() |