On Thu Jan 9, 2025 at 2:25 PM CET, Kalle Valo wrote: > "Nicolas Escande" <nico.escande@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Sat Dec 28, 2024 at 11:13 AM CET, Steffen Moser wrote: > >> Dear Remi, > >> > >> thank you very much for the pointer to the patch. Sebastian integrated > >> it into DD-WRT. Now the DynaLink DL-WRX36 runs absolutely smoothly, the > >> WLAN links are stable, the packet loss is gone. No weird states anymore, > >> independent from the group key exchange interval: > >> > >> https://data.saps.uni-ulm.de/index.php/s/NLNpWqjc8iGsaEM > >> > >> So your idea was a direct hit! Thank you very, very much. Several months > >> of debugging have come to an end... > > > > So this is at least the second time this commit breaks a setup. > > > > @ath11k why isn't this pushed to mainline ? > > This seems to be a clear regression, so even if there is no need to rush things > > in the long run this still needs to to reverted mainline right ? > > Good question, I don't have an answer to that. Could someone (also > outside of Qualcomm) send a proper patch ASAP so that we can solve this? > And it's good ot include the link to this discussion and describe the > symptoms the revert is fixing. > > This is the patch in question: > > https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/qsdk/oss/system/feeds/wlan-open/-/blob/win.wlan_host_opensource.3.0.r24/patches/ath11k/350-ath11k-Revert-clear-the-keys-properly-when-DISABLE_K.patch Not sure if I did it the right way but it at least is here : https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20250117191455.3395145-1-nico.escande@xxxxxxxxx/
