On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 01:39:33PM +0100, Ariel Otilibili wrote: > Coverity-ID: 1269173, 1575053 > Signed-off-by: Ariel Otilibili <ariel.otilibili-anieli@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/s2io.c | 2 -- > drivers/net/phy/nxp-c45-tja11xx-macsec.c | 1 - Please split this into a patch per driver. > 2 files changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/s2io.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/s2io.c > index f8016dc25e0a..4f89f9fd8043 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/s2io.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/s2io.c > @@ -1969,8 +1969,6 @@ static void en_dis_err_alarms(struct s2io_nic *nic, u16 mask, int flag) > MC_ERR_REG_ECC_ALL_DBL | PLL_LOCK_N, flag, > &bar0->mc_err_mask); > } > - nic->general_int_mask = gen_int_mask; > - > /* Remove this line when alarm interrupts are enabled */ > nic->general_int_mask = 0; So this change looks reasonable, but you need to update the comment, because it is now wrong. > } > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/nxp-c45-tja11xx-macsec.c b/drivers/net/phy/nxp-c45-tja11xx-macsec.c > index 550ef08970f4..e15ab9ba2f50 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/phy/nxp-c45-tja11xx-macsec.c > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/nxp-c45-tja11xx-macsec.c > @@ -818,7 +818,6 @@ static void nxp_c45_rx_sc_update(struct phy_device *phydev, > u32 cfg = 0; > > nxp_c45_macsec_read(phydev, MACSEC_RXSC_CFG, &cfg); > - cfg &= ~MACSEC_RXSC_CFG_VF_MASK; > cfg = phy_secy->secy->validate_frames << MACSEC_RXSC_CFG_VF_OFF; I can see why a static analysis tool would point this out, but you need to include some justification why your change is correct, and it is not a bug, maybe cfg should be written back after being masked? Or the assignment to cfg should actually be an |= not = ? Andrew
