On 11/26/2024 2:02 AM, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 11:23 PM Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/23/2024 8:43 AM, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 9:51 PM Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/22/2024 5:50 AM, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 6:32 PM Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/20/2024 4:16 AM, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've got an ath11k card that is failing to init on an IMX8MM system
>>>>>>> with 4GB of DRAM:
>>>>>>> [ 7.551582] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0 [mem
>>>>>>> 0x18000000-0x181fffff 64bit]: assigned
>>>>>>> [ 7.551713] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
>>>>>>> [ 7.552401] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: MSI vectors: 16
>>>>>>> [ 7.552440] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qcn9074 hw1.0
>>>>>>> [ 7.887186] mhi mhi0: Loaded FW: ath11k/QCN9074/hw1.0/amss.bin,
>>>>>>> sha256: 5ee1b7b204541b5f99984f21d694ececaec08fbce1b520ffe6fe740b02a4afd7
>>>>>>> [ 8.435964] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x0 chip_family 0x0
>>>>>>> board_id 0xff soc_id 0xffffffff
>>>>>>> [ 8.435991] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x270206d0
>>>>>>> fw_build_timestamp 2022-08-04 12:48 fw_build_id
>>>>>>> WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>>>>>>> [ 8.441700] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: Loaded FW:
>>>>>>> ath11k/QCN9074/hw1.0/board-2.bin, sha256:
>>>>>>> dbf0ca14aa1229eccd48f26f1026901b9718b143bd30b51b8ea67c84ba6207f1
>>>>>>> [ 9.753764] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: Loaded FW:
>>>>>>> ath11k/QCN9074/hw1.0/m3.bin, sha256:
>>>>>>> b6d957f335073a15a8de809398e1506f0200a08747eaf7189c843cf519ffc1de
>>>>>>> [ 9.789791] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz:
>>>>>>> 1048583 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 2528 (slots)
>>>>>>> [ 9.789853] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to set up tcl_comp ring (0) :-12
>>>>>>> [ 9.790238] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to init DP: -12
>>>>>>> root@noble-venice:~# cat /proc/cmdline
>>>>>>> console=ttymxc1,115200 earlycon=ec_imx6q,0x30890000,115200
>>>>>>> root=PARTUUID=5cdde84f-01 rootwait net.ifnames=0 cma=196M
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The IMX8MM's DRAM base is at 1GB so anything above 3GB hits the 32bit
>>>>>>> address boundary. If I pass in a mem=3096M the device registers just
>>>>>>> fine.
>>>>>> yeah ... that parameter makes kernel alloc memory below 32bit boundary, thus swiotlb is not necessary.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Baochen,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, that makes sense as I step through the code. On IMX8M with DRAM
>>>>> 3GB or less dma_capable(...) is true so swiotlb bounce buffers are not
>>>>> needed.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I found this to be the case with modern kernels however I found
>>>>>>> differing behavior with older kernels:
>>>>>>> - 6.6 and 6.1 the device registers with 4GB DRAM but crashes on client connect
>>>>>>> - 5.15 devices registers with 4GB DRAM and appears to work just fine
>>>>>> are you using Linus' tree or the stable tree?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For 6.6 I tested stable.
>>>> can you try Linus's tree ? as I know the stable tree is possible to miss some important fix.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This likely has something to do with commit dbd73acb22d8 ("wifi:
>>>>> ath11k: enable 36 bit mask for stream DMA") but it would seem to me
>>>>> that patch was trying to avoid the entire 32bit DMA limitation. Maybe
>>>>> that patch sets the ath11k device DMA mask to 36 bits but maybe the
>>>>> IMX8M PCI DMA is only capable of 32bits?
>>>> that patch is making situation better, not worse. that said, it helps to avoid swiotlb in
>>>> ath11k DMA, rather than to get it involved.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, that patch would be an improvement on systems capable of
>>> addressing 64bit memory but not on the IMX8M which is seemingly
>>> capable of only 32bit DMA over PCI.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could anyone explain what is going on here? Obviously there have been
>>>>>>> changes at some point to start using swiotlb which I believe was all
>>>>>>> about avoiding 32bit DMA limitations but I'm not clear how I should be
>>>>>>> configuring this for IMX8MM with 4GB DRAM. Maybe my kernel IOMMU
>>>>>>> configuration is incorrect somehow?
>>>>>> there are quite some options associated with IOMMU, not sure which one might be causing this. But basically you may check:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CONFIG_IOMMU_IOVA
>>>>>> CONFIG_IOMMU_API
>>>>>> CONFIG_IOMMU_SUPPORT
>>>>>> CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA=y
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> These are enabled which I believe appropriate for IMX8M. If I want to
>>>>> utilize the full 4GB DRAM on IMX then I must use IOMMU and swiotlb
>>>>> which would mean a performance hit due to copying mem to/from bounce
>>>>> buffers not to mention the fact that I can't figure out how to
>>>>> configure the system to avoid the 'swiotlb swiotlb buffer is full'
>>>>> issue.
>>>
>>> My statement regarding needing an IOMMU above is wrong; apparently the
>>> IMX8M SoC's don't have an IOMMU but the fact I have it enabled in the
>>> kernel should be a don't-care. If I understand swiotlb correctly, if I
>>> did have an IOMMU then it would be used instead of swiotlb.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Enabling CONFIG_SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC does not help nor does increasing the
>>>>> number of slots - it has something to do with the number/size of DMA
>>>>> buffers that ath11k is asking for:
>>>> yeah, ath11k asks for fixed size DMA buffer regardless of that config.
>>>>
>>>>> # dmesg | grep swiotlb_tbl_map_single
>>>>> [ 5.237731] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16384 (slots=32768/ 32)
>>>>> [ 5.247519] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16416 (slots=32768/ 64)
>>>>> [ 5.261794] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16448 (slots=32768/ 96)
>>>>> [ 5.275114] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16480 (slots=32768/ 128)
>>>>> [ 5.287757] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16512 (slots=32768/ 160)
>>>>> [ 5.299688] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16544 (slots=32768/ 192)
>>>>> [ 5.312482] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16576 (slots=32768/ 224)
>>>>> [ 5.324493] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16608 (slots=32768/ 256)
>>>>> [ 5.337001] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16640 (slots=32768/ 288)
>>>>> [ 5.346754] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16672 (slots=32768/ 320)
>>>>> [ 5.356571] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16704 (slots=32768/ 352)
>>>>> [ 5.366372] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16736 (slots=32768/ 384)
>>>>> [ 5.376164] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16768 (slots=32768/ 416)
>>>>> [ 5.385944] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16800 (slots=32768/ 448)
>>>>> [ 5.395712] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16832 (slots=32768/ 480)
>>>>> [ 5.408270] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16864 (slots=32768/ 512)
>>>>> [ 5.419768] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16896 (slots=32768/ 544)
>>>>> [ 5.430966] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16928 (slots=32768/ 576)
>>>>> [ 5.442368] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16960 (slots=32768/ 608)
>>>>> [ 5.452422] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 16992 (slots=32768/ 640)
>>>>> [ 5.463507] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 17024 (slots=32768/ 672)
>>>>> [ 5.473536] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 17056 (slots=32768/ 704)
>>>>> [ 5.485661] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 17088 (slots=32768/ 736)
>>>>> [ 5.495404] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 17120 (slots=32768/ 768)
>>>>> [ 5.509626] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 17152 (slots=32768/ 800)
>>>>> [ 5.519353] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 17184 (slots=32768/ 832)
>>>>> [ 5.529077] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 17216 (slots=32768/ 864)
>>>>> [ 5.538799] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 17248 (slots=32768/ 896)
>>>>> [ 5.548517] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 17280 (slots=32768/ 928)
>>>>> [ 5.558238] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 17312 (slots=32768/ 960)
>>>>> [ 5.567965] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 17344 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.578943] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 0 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.578964] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 52B index= 8192 (slots=32768/ 993)
>>>>> [ 5.599793] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 32 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.599861] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 68B index= 8193 (slots=32768/ 993)
>>>>> [ 5.609589] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 64 (slots=32768/ 993)
>>>>> [ 5.628921] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 96 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.638703] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 68B index= 17376 (slots=32768/ 993)
>>>>> [ 5.649602] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 128 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.659389] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 160 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.674038] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 96B index= 17377 (slots=32768/ 993)
>>>>> [ 5.685016] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 192 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.694819] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 224 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.694831] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 52B index= 17378 (slots=32768/ 993)
>>>>> [ 5.714194] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 40B index= 17379 (slots=32768/ 994)
>>>>> [ 5.725089] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 256 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.753507] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17380 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 5.764668] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 288 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.774456] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 320 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.774620] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17384 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 5.795091] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 352 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.795241] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17388 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 5.815724] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 384 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.815884] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17392 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 5.836357] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 416 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.836368] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 52B index= 8194 (slots=32768/ 993)
>>>>> [ 5.855856] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17396 (slots=32768/ 997)
>>>>> [ 5.866818] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 448 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.866978] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17400 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 5.887451] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 480 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.897231] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 512 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.897389] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17404 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 5.917866] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 544 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.918026] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17408 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 5.938489] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 576 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.938642] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17412 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 5.959121] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 608 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.959135] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 52B index= 8195 (slots=32768/ 993)
>>>>> [ 5.978619] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17416 (slots=32768/ 997)
>>>>> [ 5.989588] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 640 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 5.989738] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17420 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 6.010215] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 672 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 6.020001] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 704 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 6.020158] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17424 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 6.040643] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 736 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 6.040798] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17428 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 6.061287] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 768 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 6.061437] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17432 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 6.081918] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 800 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 6.081929] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 52B index= 8196 (slots=32768/ 993)
>>>>> [ 6.101409] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17436 (slots=32768/ 997)
>>>>> [ 6.112375] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 832 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 6.112528] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17440 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 6.133004] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 864 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 6.142785] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 896 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 6.142949] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17444 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 6.163426] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 928 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 6.163576] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17448 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 6.184058] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 960 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 6.184208] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17452 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 6.204691] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 992 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 6.204704] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 52B index= 8197 (slots=32768/ 993)
>>>>> [ 6.224183] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17456 (slots=32768/ 997)
>>>>> [ 6.235148] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 1024 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 6.235308] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 6224B index= 17460 (slots=32768/ 996)
>>>>> [ 6.255777] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 1056 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 6.265552] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 1088 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 6.265633] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 2128B index= 17464 (slots=32768/ 994)
>>>>> [ 6.286142] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 1120 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 6.286182] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 72B index= 17466 (slots=32768/ 993)
>>>>> [ 7.574489] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 1152 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 7.584645] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 60B index= 17467 (slots=32768/ 993)
>>>>> [ 7.595593] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 1184 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 7.595608] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 52B index= 8198 (slots=32768/ 993)
>>>>> [ 7.605359] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 1216 (slots=32768/ 993)
>>>>> [ 7.624703] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 452B index= 1248 (slots=32768/ 993)
>>>>> [ 7.635603] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 1280 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 7.645344] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 52B index= 1312 (slots=32768/ 993)
>>>>> [ 7.656247] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 1314 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 7.683567] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single size=
>>>>> 65535B index= 1346 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>> [ 7.696095] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb_tbl_map_single
>>>>> size=1048583B index= -1 (slots=32768/ 992)
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm still trying to understand the swiotlb allocation to see if there
>>>>> is some configuration change I should be making.
>>>>
>>>> I suspect you hit the same issue mentioned here:
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAOMZO5A7+nxACoBPY0k8cOpVQByZtEV_N1489MK5wETHF_RXWA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>>>
>>>> so can you check if below commit present in your kernel, and if not could you pick it up
>>>> and try again?
>>>>
>>>> commit 14cebf689a78 ("swiotlb: Reinstate page-alignment for mappings >= PAGE_SIZE")
>> ignore this request since it should be no related to your issue :(
>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I bisected the 'swiotlb buffer is full' issue back to commit
>>> aaf244141ed7 ("wifi: ath11k: fix IOMMU errors on buffer rings") which
>>> looks to me to be a legitimate fix and if I revert it swiotlb is now
>>> happy and the driver registers but I get the crash on client connect
>>> that I was seeing in 6.6 so that commit fixes an issue, but causes
>>> swiotlb to not be fulfilled.
>> not really ... that commit is not the cause to your issue. you don;t see the 'swiotlb
>> full' error after revert it simply because dma_map_single() is NOT called then.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> The issue seems to be that the swiotlb memory buffer allocator is
>>> getting too fragmented to be useful with what ath11k is now asking for
>>> (a lot of 2K and 64K buffers and then finally a 1048583B buffer which
>>> fails due to the fragmentation of the swiotlb buffer.
>> no, the direct cause to 'swiotlb full' error is that kernel does not allow a swiotlb map
>> request larger than 256kb [1]:
>>
>> 'A single allocation from swiotlb is limited to IO_TLB_SIZE * IO_TLB_SEGSIZE bytes, which
>> is 256 KiB with current definitions'
>>
>> while here ath11k is requesting a buffer of 1048583 bytes.
>>
>>
>> howevr the question is that why swiotlb is involved here: for streamed DMA operation
>> ath11k is capable of addressing 64GB memory (with 36bit DMA mask), in your case this
>> covers whole system memory. the most possible reason I can think of is that swiotlb is
>> forcebly enabled in your kernel (with swiotlb=force?) such that each DMA buffer would be
>> bounced by swiotlb regardless of its physical address.
>>
>
> I do not have swiotlb forced explicitly. Again, this is because I'm on
> a IMX8MM with 4GiB DRAM which has no IOMMU and a 32bit DMA where
> peripherals can not access memory over 3GiB as its base DRAM starting
> at 1GiB (so swiotlb is getting used with a DRAM size >3GiB).
ah ... I get your point and agree. so the limitation doesn't come from the ath11k
hardware, but comes from IMX8MM itself. I guess the direct cause for involving swiotlb is
dma_capable() returns false due to dev->bus_dma_limit is ((1ULL << 32) - 1).
>
> Reverting commit d0e2523bfa9c ("ath11k: allocate HAL_WBM2SW_RELEASE
> ring from cacheable memory") indeed resolves this issue.
correct. by reverting it ath11k uses dma_alloc_coherent() instead of dma_map_single(), so
the issue is gone.
>
> I notice that ath12k has a similar architecture as ath11k where
> ath12k_dp_srng_setup() looks like what ath11k_dp_srng_setup() before
> the change to allocate its buffers from cacheable memory so it's
> probably just a matter of time before the same changes are made to
> ath12k which will break that for this platform/memory-size as well.
thanks, will take care.
>
> So the way I see to resolve this either:
> a) revert commit d0e2523bfa9c ("ath11k: allocate HAL_WBM2SW_RELEASE
> ring from cacheable memory") - to stop asking for buffers >256KiB
> b) find some other use of that upper 1GiB so that it can't be
> allocated by DMA and swiotlb isn't needed
> c) tell my board users to use mem=3096M and lose that last 1GiB of DRAM
while the first one seems best it impacts performance. so I get another proposal: in case
IOMMU not present, check DMA adressing limitation before allocating the buffer. If it can
not cover 36 bit memory space and the system is able to alloc buffers above 4Gb, pass
GFP_DMA32 or GFP_DMA to kzalloc() such that we can get a buffer below 4GB/16MB.
anyway, can u send a patch for that?
>
>>
>>
>> [1] Documentation/core-api/swiotlb.rst
>>
>>>
>>> I'm guessing that this has gone unnoticed for a while because there
>>> are maybe not a lot of systems out there that require swiotlb with
>>> ath11k (either no IOMMU or more memory than DMA can address) and my
>>> guess is that if you test ath11k with swiotlb=force you will easily
>>> see this 'swiotlb buffer is full' issue on other systems.
>>>
>>> I'm not that knowledgeable about ath11k but I do know that ath10 and
>>> ath12k do not have this issue with swiotlb. Debugging a bit shows that
>>> there are a lot of large DMA buffers being requested by ath11k and I'm
>>> wondering if that could be reduced or optimized somehow.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To avoid using swiotlb is there some way to limit the memory region
>>>>> used for DMA operations to below 32bit boundary yet still allow the
>>>>> memory above 32bit to be useful in the system for userspace maybe?
>>>> if you are using dma_alloc_coherent() I'm afraid there is no way for that. the API
>>>> internally ignores any zone flags passed with the 'gfp' argument. see
>>>>
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kernel/dma/mapping.c#n615
>>>>
>>>
>>> is DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL a solution for me?
>> i don;t think this help since this is used in coherent DMA?
>>
>
> While DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL does allow defining the area used by swiotlb
> it doesn't change the way swiotlb allocates buffers or the fact that
> swiotlb is used at all.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Tim
>
>
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>
