On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Pavel Roskin <proski@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Quoting "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> I've been trying to avoid string.h on crda.c, granted it only >> increases the final crda binary by about 30 bytes, but do we really >> need it? In fact it'd be nice to further trim crda further to save >> even more space. Thoughts? > > OK, maybe we don't need this patch if CDRA works correctly. I'm having bad > luck with it. > > First of all, I cannot generate regulatory.bin that crda would accept. > > [proski@dv wireless-regdb]$ make > ./db2bin.py regulatory.bin db.txt key.priv.pem > openssl rsa -in key.priv.pem -out key.pub.pem -pubout -outform PEM > writing RSA key You don't need to build this unless you want to define your own rules. > [proski@dv crda]$ make > GEN keys-gcrypt.c > CC reglib.o > CC crda.o > LD crda > CC intersect.o > CC print-regdom.o > LD intersect > CC regdbdump.o > LD regdbdump > CHK /home/proski/src/wireless-regdb/regulatory.bin > Database signature verification failed. > make: *** [verify] Error 234 And if you do and want to use the signature stuff you need to copy the RSA public key into pubkeys/ directory of CRDA. Did you try that? Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
