On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 10:51 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote: > Hmm.. The addition of support to add interfaces dynamically with mkdir > sounds reasonable, but I'm not sure whether I really like the part of > removing debugfs support.. mac80211_hwsim is a developer tool and I want > to be able to have an undocumented and free for changes interface > (debugfs) that does not have so strict requirement on kernel-userspace > interface. This patch seems to also be moving the PS testing parameter > to use configfs. If this means that it will be more difficult to change > that mechanism or add new parameters in the future, I'm not sure I would > support that part of the change. As has been argued elsewhere, a few interfaces in debugfs have also become "stable" to a point that they can't be changed much any more... I think since this is a development tool even configfs could be declared an in-development API? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
