Hi,
Thank you for submitting the patch.
On Wednesday, 6 November 2024 13:41:44 CET Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Since this is based on ideas by all three people, but not actually
> directly derived from any of the patches, I'm including Suggested-by
> tags from Simon, Sven and Felix below, which should hopefully serve as
> proper credit.
At least for me, this is more than enough. Thanks.
I don't have the setup at the moment to test it again - maybe Issam can do
this. One concern I would have (because I don't find the notes regarding this
problem), is whether this check is now breaking because we count more things.
In the past, rxlp/rxok was used for the check. And now I don't know whether
the count for the other ones were still increasing.
* RXHP (rather sure that "high priority frame" wasn't increasing)
* RXEOL ("no RX descriptors available" - I would guess no, but I can't say for
sure)
* RXORN ("FIFO overrun" I would guess no, but I can't say for sure)
Reviewed-by: Sven Eckelmann <se@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Kind regards,
Sven
