On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 03:43:24AM +0000, Ping-Ke Shih wrote: > Ladislav Michl <oss-lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 09:42:55AM +0800, Ping-Ke Shih wrote: > > > When removing kernel modules by: > > > rmmod rtw88_8723cs rtw88_8703b rtw88_8723x rtw88_sdio rtw88_core > > > > > > Driver uses skb_queue_purge() to purge TX skb, but not report tx status > > > causing "Have pending ack frames!" warning. Use ieee80211_purge_tx_queue() > > > to correct this. > > > > > > Since ieee80211_purge_tx_queue() doesn't take locks, to prevent racing > > > between TX work and purge TX queue, flush and destroy TX work in advance. > > > > A the very same problem exists in 6.1 kernel series, where this patch > > becomes oneliner: > > linux-6.1.y branch doesn't have patch that exports ieee80211_purge_tx_queue(). Sure, but that one applies with a little fuzz. > > --- > > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c > > index 81f3112923f1..d7d4b0f05da9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c > > @@ -2145,7 +2145,7 @@ void rtw_core_deinit(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev) > > > > destroy_workqueue(rtwdev->tx_wq); > > spin_lock_irqsave(&rtwdev->tx_report.q_lock, flags); > > - skb_queue_purge(&rtwdev->tx_report.queue); > > + ieee80211_purge_tx_queue(rtwdev->hw, &rtwdev->tx_report.queue); > > skb_queue_purge(&rtwdev->coex.queue); > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtwdev->tx_report.q_lock, flags); > > > > Seemingly, we need below also? Perhaps I was lucky enough I never hit it here, but for a sake of completeness it should be there as well. > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c > index 6ed470dd6f22..224678b9c38b 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c > @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ void rtw_tx_report_purge_timer(struct timer_list *t) > rtw_warn(rtwdev, "failed to get tx report from firmware\n"); > > spin_lock_irqsave(&tx_report->q_lock, flags); > - skb_queue_purge(&tx_report->queue); > + ieee80211_purge_tx_queue(&tx_report->queue); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx_report->q_lock, flags); > } > > Have you seen "Have pending ack frames!" in your side? Yes. > If so, use above changes to verify again on the latest kernel, and send a patch? Do you mean to send a patch against linux-6.1.y stable tree? I can see your patch in wireless-next only, so I do not think sending it to stable now would work. But in general, having this fix in the stable trees is a good idea. ladis
