On Thu, 2024-10-31 at 10:25 +0100, Benjamin Berg wrote: > > Right, which does seem to imply that a non-NSTR AP can very well set a > Medium Delay Synchronization. Yes, we also pass it to the firmware in iwlwifi, so definitely. > > Regarding the statement “Could it be that this is intended to be used by > > NSTR APs only,” I did not find any explicit indication in the spec that > > the multi-link probe response carrying the medium sync delay subfield is > > solely applicable to NSTR APs. > > > > Additionally, do you have any suggestions on how to address this issue?🙂 > > Not really. I don't grasp the intention of the specification here. But > if an AP may include the field in an ML Probe Response, then we > obviously cannot rely on the value to be consistent. > > Seems to me that the option to remove the check is still the best way > forward right now. Agree, let's just remove it - Lingbo do you want to send a patch? We should probably compare "extended MLD capabilities and ops" though, haha. johannes
