Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Pei Xiao <xiaopei01@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > kmalloc may fail, return might be NULL and will cause > > NULL pointer dereference later. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pei Xiao <xiaopei01@xxxxxxxxxx> > > We use 'wifi: rtw89:' in the title, please check the documentation below > for more. > A way to known subject prefix is to use git log with the files touched by this patch: git log --oneline drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c Also subject can point out specific function. Then my opinion is "wifi: rtw89: coex: check NULL return of kmalloc in btc_fw_set_monreg()"
