On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 12:48 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 14:05 +0300, Miri Korenblit wrote: > > From: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Since we no longer shut down the device in suspend, we also no longer > > call iwl_mvm_mei_device_state() and this is a problem because iwlmei > > [snip > > config IWLMEI > ... > depends on BROKEN > > > so there's no way this matters upstream? And since Emmanuel pointed it out - I meant here it doesn't need to go to the wireless tree, nobody is going to mark it non-BROKEN there, so it can go with other stuff to wireless-next, perhaps eventually together with a patch to mark it non-BROKEN. johannes
