Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The previous implementation included an unnecessary else > condition paired with a continue statement. Since a check > is already performed to determine if the band is either > 2G or 5G, the else condition will never be triggered. > We can remove this check. > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410171143.OnFlgIwK-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ no need this Closes link because of typo of v1. I will remove this during merging. > Signed-off-by: Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: > - Changed from using a pointer approach to a simpler if-else structure for clarity. > --- > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c > index 37ef80c9091d..8b9f8f73c14c 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c > @@ -1470,10 +1470,8 @@ static void rtw_phy_store_tx_power_by_rate(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, > rate = rates[i]; > if (band == PHY_BAND_2G) > hal->tx_pwr_by_rate_offset_2g[rfpath][rate] = offset; > - else if (band == PHY_BAND_5G) > - hal->tx_pwr_by_rate_offset_5g[rfpath][rate] = offset; > else > - continue; > + hal->tx_pwr_by_rate_offset_5g[rfpath][rate] = offset; > } > } > > -- > 2.47.0