Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 06:27:38PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > We already exclude wireless drivers from the netdev@ traffic, to >> > delegate it to linux-wireless@, and avoid overwhelming netdev@. >> > >> > Many of the following wireless-related sections MAINTAINERS >> > are already not included in the NETWORKING [GENERAL] section. >> > For consistency, exclude those that are. >> > >> > * 802.11 (including CFG80211/NL80211) >> > * MAC80211 >> > * RFKILL >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > MAINTAINERS | 11 +++++++++++ >> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> > index c27f3190737f..ea3ea2c0d3fa 100644 >> > --- a/MAINTAINERS >> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> > @@ -16197,8 +16197,19 @@ F: lib/random32.c >> > F: net/ >> > F: tools/net/ >> > F: tools/testing/selftests/net/ >> > +X: Documentation/networking/mac80211-injection.rst >> > +X: Documentation/networking/mac80211_hwsim/ >> > +X: Documentation/networking/regulatory.rst >> > +X: include/net/cfg80211.h >> > +X: include/net/ieee80211_radiotap.h >> > +X: include/net/iw_handler.h >> > +X: include/net/mac80211.h >> > +X: include/net/wext.h >> >> Should we add also lib80211.h? > > Thanks, I missed that one. Perhaps it should have: > > * An F: entry in the MAC80211 > * An X: entry in the NETWORKING [GENERAL] > > If so, perhaps I can just add that to a v2 of this patch. > Let me know what you think. Like Johannes said, the cfg80211 entry is more approriate but otherwise sounds like a good plan, thanks! -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
