In 'cfg80211_free_coalesce', '&coalesce->rules[i]' is a pointer
to VLA member of 'struct cfg80211_coalesce' and should never be NULL,
so redundant check may be dropped.
I think this is correct, but I haven't tested it seriously.
Compile tested only.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kandybka <d.kandybka@xxxxxxxxx>
---
net/wireless/nl80211.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
index 9ab777e0bd4d..b71fa8beea1f 100644
--- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c
+++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
@@ -14061,8 +14061,6 @@ void cfg80211_free_coalesce(struct cfg80211_coalesce *coalesce)
for (i = 0; i < coalesce->n_rules; i++) {
rule = &coalesce->rules[i];
- if (!rule)
- continue;
for (j = 0; j < rule->n_patterns; j++)
kfree(rule->patterns[j].mask);
kfree(rule->patterns);
--
2.43.5
