On 19/09/2024 09:48, Kalle Valo wrote: > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On 14/08/2024 10:23, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Describe the inputs from the PMU of the ath11k module on WCN6855. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> v1 -> v2: >>> - update the example >> >> I don't understand why this patch is no being picked up. The code >> correct represents the piece of hardware. The supplies should be >> required, because this one particular device - the one described in this >> binding - cannot work without them. > > I have already explained the situation. With supplies changed to > optional I'm happy take the patch. You did not provide any relevant argument to this case. Your concerns described quite different case and are no applicable to DT based platforms. Best regards, Krzysztof
