Johannes Berg wrote: > I agree with Jouni, this is probably not a good idea, especially since > this flag would be shared between hardware for those drivers that have > the channel structs allocated statically. We should probably just stick > a struct ieee80211_channel *switch_from; pointer somewhere into the > sdata struct or so. Ok. > I think I'd like to have them dropped to monitor for !station here, > instead of silently in the processing function. Ok. > That should probably be removed or be more specific & protected by some > debug #ifdef. That just slipped through, I'll remove it. > Can you rebase this on top of Kalle's patch that adds the "stop reasons" > for each queue? As it is now, the driver could wake up the queues again > if one was full. Ok, I will. Sujith -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
