On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:22:39AM -0500, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Benoit PAPILLAULT > <benoit.papillault@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > frames. To me, the bug we have seen when receiving a ACK frame in > > monitor mode was not because "ACK is a small control frame", it was > > because the header length we computed was smaller than what the hardware > > considered. > > It's because data frames have a payload and ACKs do not. > > > To reply to Bob as well, we need to compute the number of padded bytes + > > the position at which the padding occurs, so proper "header" length is > > required. > > Well, anyway John already picked up your earlier (better, IMHO) patch. > Now we just need to fix the tx descriptors :) Based on that comment, I'm dropping this version of the patch. Feel free to submit additional patches to implement whatever might be missing now. John -- John W. Linville Linux should be at the core linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx of your literate lifestyle. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
