Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 15/08/2024 09:14, Ping-Ke Shih wrote: > > Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The RTL8821AU and RTL8812AU have smaller RA report size, only 4 bytes. > >> Avoid the "invalid ra report c2h length" error. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c | 8 ++++++-- > >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.h | 1 + > >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8703b.c | 1 + > >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c | 1 + > >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8821c.c | 1 + > >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.c | 1 + > >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c | 1 + > >> 7 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c > >> index 782f3776e0a0..ac53e3e30af0 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c > >> @@ -157,7 +157,10 @@ static void rtw_fw_ra_report_iter(void *data, struct ieee80211_sta *sta) > >> > >> rate = GET_RA_REPORT_RATE(ra_data->payload); > >> sgi = GET_RA_REPORT_SGI(ra_data->payload); > >> - bw = GET_RA_REPORT_BW(ra_data->payload); > >> + if (si->rtwdev->chip->c2h_ra_report_size < 7) > > > > Explicitly specify '== 4' for the case of RTL8821AU and RTL8812AU. > > > >> + bw = si->bw_mode; > >> + else > >> + bw = GET_RA_REPORT_BW(ra_data->payload); > >> > > > > > > Would that make sense? I check for less than 7 because the size > has to be at least 7 in order to access payload[6] (GET_RA_REPORT_BW). As you did "WARN(length < rtwdev->chip->c2h_ra_report_size)", I assume you expect "< 7" cases is only for coming chips RTL8821AU and RTL8812AU. Maybe explicitly specifying chips ID would be easier to understand: if (chip == RTL8821A || chip == RTL8812A) bw = si->bw_mode; else bw = GET_RA_REPORT_BW(ra_data->payload); That's why I want "== 4". (but it seems implicitly not explicitly though.)