On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 10:24:13AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Guillaume Nault <gnault@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:08:44AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > >> + Guillaume and Ido > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 03:17:42PM +0800, hhorace wrote: > >> > According to RFC8325 4.3, Multimedia Streaming: AF31(011010, 26), > >> > AF32(011100, 28), AF33(011110, 30) maps to User Priority = 4 > >> > and AC_VI (Video). > >> > > >> > However, the original code remain the default three Most Significant > >> > Bits (MSBs) of the DSCP, which makes AF3x map to User Priority = 3 > >> > and AC_BE (Best Effort). > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: hhorace <hhoracehsu@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Adding Guillaume and Ido as this relates to DSCP. > > > > Thanks. The patch looks good to me (only missing a Fixes tag). > > > > Just a note to hhorace: the entry for CS5 (case 40) is useless as CS5 > > is 101000. So the value of the 3 high order bits already is 5 (in case > > you want to make a followup patch for net-next). > > Minor clarification: cfg80211 patches go to wireless-next, not net-next. Yes, sorry for the confusion :-/. > -- > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ > > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches >
