On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 19:20 -0500, Richard Farina wrote: > > Umm, these aren't really defined by radiotap yet. Does all of this have > > to be NOW? > Is there a compelling reason to prohibit progress? Well, it should be done with radiotap.org... Incidentally, the new list is there. radiotap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
