Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use 128 bytes aligned iova in transmit path for WCN7850

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 7/19/2024 10:10 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 7/14/2024 7:38 PM, Baochen Qiang wrote:
>> In transmit path, it is likely that the iova is not aligned to PCIe TLP
>> max payload size, which is 128 for WCN7850. Normally in such cases hardware
>> is expected to split the packet into several parts in a manner such that
>> they, other than the first one, have aligned iova. However due to hardware
>> limitations, WCN7850 does not behave like that properly with some specific
>> unaligned iova in transmit path. This easily results in target hang in a
>> KPI transmit test: packet send/receive failure, WMI command send timeout
>> etc. Also fatal error seen in PCIe level:
>>
>> 	...
>> 	Capabilities: ...
>> 		...
>> 		DevSta: ... FatalErr+ ...
>> 		...
>> 	...
>>
>> Work around this by manually moving/reallocating payload buffer such that
>> we can map it to a 128 bytes aligned iova. The moving requires sufficient
>> head room or tail room in skb: for the former we can do ourselves a favor
>> by asking some extra bytes when registering with mac80211, while for the
>> latter we can do nothing.
>>
>> Moving/reallocating buffer consumes additional CPU cycles, but the good news
>> is that an aligned iova increases PCIe efficiency. In my tests on some X86
>> platforms the KPI results are almost consistent.
>>
>> Since this is seen only with WCN7850, add a new hardware parameter to
>> differentiate from others.
> 
> I asked for expert opinion on this patch and received the following response.
> Baochen, can you take a look at this suggestion?
> 
>> Aligning headers is sometimes done, but it appears the driver
>> doesn't support scatter gather? I think the author may want to advertise
right, ath12k does not support SG currently.

>> scatter and linearize manually in the driver, to a correct offset.
is there an existing skb API or API combinations which can do that for me? I checked __skb_linearize() and it does not take an 'offset' argument.

>> Because now core is linearizing the skb in validate_xmit_skb()
>> and then the driver moves it a second time..
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux