On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 23:32 +0100, Stefanik Gábor wrote: >> Userspace packet injector applications might want to transmit packets >> that are, by design, not supposed to be acked. In other cases, an >> injector application may need to control the sequence number of the >> packets it transmits. Introduce 2 new flags in the "TX flags" Radiotap >> fields, controlling these 2 behaviors. >> >> The new fields are as follows: >> >> * IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_TX_FLAGS >> >> IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_F_TX_NO_ACK: Transmit the packet once with no waiting for >> an ACK and no retrying if no ACK received >> IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_F_TX_NO_SEQ: Use the sequence number already present in >> the 802.11 header, do not generate a new one >> in the driver/stack. Useful when injecting >> fragments with the same sequence number. > > Umm, these aren't really defined by radiotap yet. Does all of this have > to be NOW? > > johannes > No, that's why I submitted it as an RFC. By the way, what is the preferred method of contacting the Radiotap staff now that the mailing list seems to be permanently down? --Gábor -- Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html