On 7/16/2024 4:06 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote: > gcc 11.4.1-3 warns about memcpy() with overlapping pointers: > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/wow.c: In function ‘ath12k_wow_convert_8023_to_80211.constprop’: > ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:114:33: error: ‘__builtin_memcpy’ accessing 18446744073709551611 or more bytes at offsets 0 and 0 overlaps 9223372036854775799 bytes at offset -9223372036854775804 [-Werror=restrict] > 114 | #define __underlying_memcpy __builtin_memcpy > | ^ > ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:637:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘__underlying_memcpy’ > 637 | __underlying_##op(p, q, __fortify_size); \ > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:682:26: note: in expansion of macro ‘__fortify_memcpy_chk’ > 682 | #define memcpy(p, q, s) __fortify_memcpy_chk(p, q, s, \ > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/wow.c:190:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘memcpy’ > 190 | memcpy(pat, eth_pat, eth_pat_len); > | ^~~~~~ > ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:114:33: error: ‘__builtin_memcpy’ accessing 18446744073709551605 or more bytes at offsets 0 and 0 overlaps 9223372036854775787 bytes at offset -9223372036854775798 [-Werror=restrict] > 114 | #define __underlying_memcpy __builtin_memcpy > | ^ > ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:637:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘__underlying_memcpy’ > 637 | __underlying_##op(p, q, __fortify_size); \ > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:682:26: note: in expansion of macro ‘__fortify_memcpy_chk’ > 682 | #define memcpy(p, q, s) __fortify_memcpy_chk(p, q, s, \ > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/wow.c:232:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘memcpy’ > 232 | memcpy(pat, eth_pat, eth_pat_len); > | ^~~~~~ > > The sum of size_t operands can overflow SIZE_MAX, triggering the > warning. > Address the issue using the suitable helper. > > Fixes: 4a3c212eee0e ("wifi: ath12k: add basic WoW functionalities") > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Only built tested. Sending directly to net to reduce the RTT, but no > objections to go through the WiFi tree first Since Kalle is on holiday please go ahead and take this via net. This looks nicer than Kalle's version :) Acked-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx>