On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 17:16 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 03:48:47PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 15:47 +0100, Stefanik Gábor wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the heads up, mail forwarded to Thomas d'Otreppe, as this > > > will need changes in airodump-ng. > > > > Guys! This format is brain-dead, it means we don't know 40MHz or SGI, > > let's define something proper in radiotap instead! > > While I'm not against defining something more officially for radiotap, > I do not agree with the part about this format being that brain-dead. > Both 40 MHz and short GI are indicated (IEEE80211_CHAN_TURBO and > IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_F_SHORTGI) and shown in the current wireshark > release. Oh, right, I noticed. Well, as I just said, it's still pretty bogus because we reuse turbo and confuse older dissectors with the 0x80 for HT bit. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
