On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 21:22 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 07:22:48PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 20:15 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote: > > > Yes. FreeBSD radiotap definition uses 0x80 as a flag in the rate field > > > for indicating that it is an MCS index, not bitrate. > > > Ugh. Nobody will dissect that properly. > > Actually, wireshark seems to have code to dissect that.. Ok, I stand corrected. Oh well, this is a huge mess... > Well, yes, I do need it like yesterday. I really want to have a reliable > sniffer that I can trust on providing correct information about received > frames. I can obviously handle a personal patch that adds this, but it > gets more complex when asking others to capture some frames for you.. Right. We'll need A-MPDU stuff too, I guess? > Anyway, I will move the radiotap parts into a separate patch and leave > it to others to decide whether that should go in now or not. The best > option (if John is willing) would likely be to get the first part > (mac80211 driver API addition and ath9k fix/cleanup) in and pushed > upstream while the radiotap parts would be maintained only in > wireless-testing for the time being. I agree, that seems best. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
