On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 08:02:48AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:56:35 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote: > > > Adding netdev to the initial message in the thread. > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAPh3n83zb1PwFBFijJKChBqY95zzpYh=2iPf8tmh=YTS6e3xPw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > There was some discussion in the thread, with the observation that the splat > > > is fixed by: > > > 2ae5c9248e06 ("wifi: mac80211: Use flexible array in struct ieee80211_tim_ie") > > > > > > Followed by discussion if this should be backported. > > > > > > Kees said that "netdev [...] maintainers have asked that contributors not > > > include "Cc: stable" tags, as they want to evaluate for themselves whether > > > patches should go to stable or not" > > > > BTW this rule doesn't apply to wireless subsystem. For wireless patches > > it's ok to "Cc: stable" in patches or anyone can send a request to > > stable maintainers to pick a patch. > > It's an old rule. Quoting documentation: > > Stable tree > ~~~~~~~~~~~ > > While it used to be the case that netdev submissions were not supposed > to carry explicit ``CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx`` tags that is no longer > the case today. Please follow the standard stable rules in > :ref:`Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst <stable_kernel_rules>`, > and make sure you include appropriate Fixes tags! > > See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#stable-tree Ah-ha! Thanks. I will fix my brain. :) -- Kees Cook
