Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 6/13/2024 11:59 AM, Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 6/13/2024 8:42 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>>> On 6/12/2024 3:53 PM, Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu wrote:
>>>> Currently SMPS configuration failed when the Information
>>>> Elements (IEs) did not contain HT or 6 GHz capabilities. This
>>>> caused legacy peer association to fail as legacy peers do not
>>>> have HT or 6 GHz capabilities. Fix this by not returning an
>>>> error when SMPS configuration fails due to the absence of HT
>>>> or 6 GHz capabilities.
>>>>
>>>> Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.0.1-00029-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: f0e61dc7ecf9 ("wifi: ath12k: refactor SMPS configuration")
>>>> Reported-by: Aditya Kumar Singh <quic_adisi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Per checkpatch:
>>> WARNING: Reported-by: should be immediately followed by Closes:
>>> with a URL to the report
>>> #17:
>>> Reported-by: Aditya Kumar Singh <quic_adisi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Is there a separate public bug report from Aditya?
>> Hi Jeff,
>> No, this was internal report and does not have weblink associated with
>> it. Also, do not want to ignore reportee.
>
> I'm unsure what do do here since there is a requirement that an acknowledged
> reporter have a public link to the bug report.
I think it's ok to ignore this checkpatch warning. Reported-by without a
closes tag should be fine.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
