[PATCH 5/6] wifi: rtw89: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()

[Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
index ddc390d24ec1..16ab834185b4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
@@ -4022,15 +4022,15 @@ void rtw89_core_update_beacon_work(struct work_struct *work)
 int rtw89_wait_for_cond(struct rtw89_wait_info *wait, unsigned int cond)
 {
 	struct completion *cmpl = &wait->completion;
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	unsigned int cur;
 
 	cur = atomic_cmpxchg(&wait->cond, RTW89_WAIT_COND_IDLE, cond);
 	if (cur != RTW89_WAIT_COND_IDLE)
 		return -EBUSY;
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(cmpl, RTW89_WAIT_FOR_COND_TIMEOUT);
-	if (timeout == 0) {
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(cmpl, RTW89_WAIT_FOR_COND_TIMEOUT);
+	if (time_left == 0) {
 		atomic_set(&wait->cond, RTW89_WAIT_COND_IDLE);
 		return -ETIMEDOUT;
 	}
-- 
2.43.0