On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 13:11 +0800, Baochen Qiang wrote:
>
> On 5/31/2024 11:42 AM, Baochen Qiang wrote:
> > > > +static void ath12k_wow_prepare_ns_offload(struct ath12k_vif *arvif,
> > > > + struct wmi_arp_ns_offload_arg *offload)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct inet6_dev *idev = arvif->idev;
> > > as noted above does it make more sense to get the netdev associated with the
> > > arvif and then use in6_dev_get(net_device) to get the inet6_dev rather than
> > > caching the pointer from the ipv6_addr_changed() callback?
> > Ah.. I didn't note that we can get inet6_dev in such a way, just thought the only way is to cache it in ipv6_changed() callback.
> >
> > will get it using the following in next version:
> > struct ieee80211_vif *vif = container_of(arvif)
> > struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sub_if_data = container_of(vif)
> > struct net_dev *ndev = sub_if_data->dev
> > struct inet6_dev *idev = in6_dev_get(ndev)
> Just found that ieee80211_sub_if_data is internal to mac80211, so not possible to get netdev in this way.
>
> any other ideas on how to get netdev?
You can go via the wdev.
johannes
